| Catch of the Day — |
[Mar. 23rd, 2008|09:51 pm] |
Confessing how I likely overlooked the significance of rumors coming out of Ireland as a result of property prices caving.. (get reports, yet lost in the heap sorting..)
Anyways the UK's Telegraph run the following storyline on 12/3/2008:—
Irish banks may need life-support as property prices crash
The Irish banking system faces acute strains and may require a phase of temporary nationalisation as the property slump leads to a wave of defaults, according to a leading Irish economist.
Morgan Kelly, of University College Dublin, said the government is almost powerless to stop the downturn becoming a severe slump. "We're in a classic post-bubble recession, yet we can't do anything that a country would normally do in this situation because we're inside the eurozone," Prof Kelly said. "We can't cut interest rates, we can't devalue, and there is a lot less room for fiscal stimulus than people think. We're stuck.
"We have a domestic recession now colliding with a global recession. It is the state of the banking system that will determine how terrible this will be, and frankly that is looking very shaky."
Irish house prices fell 7pc last year. The pace of decline has accelerated so far this year. The damage is spreading to the broader economy. Unemployment jumped to an eight-year high of 5.2pc in February, from 5pc in January.
We are going to see banks on life-support with very big bail-outs. The precedent for this is what happened in the Nordic countries in the early 1990s when they had to take over the banks. We may have to do something similar," he said. Further to this and consequent Mr. Bernanke's action vis a vis Bear Stearns (h/t: PB@PBboard) economist David McWilliams - 19/3/2008 on Forbe's vid - asked How much has Corporate America invested in Ireland?
And the board - highly informed for the most part - came back with a glut of responses amounting to:—
Twice the amount that it has invested in China and India - combined. This uses Ireland as a platform for export to Europe/EU (Ireland has record low corporate tax regime within EU). Which leads on the the significant question of what would happen to Ireland and the Irish economy in the global crunch/recession scenario considered underway (at least in part) should US money be withdrawn to shore up corporate balance sheets and liquidity in the US?
Known to date is how the Dublin government appears to be almost powerless to prevent a severe downturn.
pp J |
|
|
| Catch of the Day -- misc.. |
[Mar. 21st, 2008|06:32 pm] |
Deserves a great clap for the fun of it. The trouble is that I canna now recall which* post(er) made the joke. Still, because it brought the biggest of smiles and still tickles me pink, I'll share it..
Winner then for expression of the day:—(Whoever) is about as much use as a chocolate teapot.. * Very english language so likely a pohm.. at ft of tol. Then again there's a sometimes lively crowd at the standard in London..
pp J |
|
|
| A Could Be.. |
[Mar. 20th, 2008|08:34 pm] |
Part answer to my question yesterday.. re mav..
h/T: Yves Smith@NC the following clip from a Bloomberg piece..Some of the same LBO (leveraged buy out) firms that generated the debt in the first place are raising funds to buy it back at reduced prices. Blackstone raised a $1.4 billion fund last November to buy bank loans, and Leon Black's Apollo has bought $1 billion of distressed loans and bonds....
In addition to the buyout firms, traditional loan investors and hedge funds are also buying the debt. Maybe 'discount takers' are 'master' counterpartying.. hey look I'm a long way from sure about this.. the language has twists and turns for starters.. but understandable would be lose now(certain) vs later(uncertain)..
pp J |
|
|
| A Quickie.. |
[Mar. 20th, 2008|02:27 pm] |
On how ATTITUDE can and will lead, too.
I never thought I'd say this but therein Rosenberg@ML is vg value..
pp J |
|
|
| Update: MAVs.. |
[Mar. 19th, 2008|05:06 pm] |
Mortgage-Lender-implode appears to have taken at least one important aspect - the capacity for derivatives' misuse/abuse etc by unscrupulous financial market operators - as related in the above post..``... even as you read these words, derivatives are emerging as the new core of the crisis. And derivatives are definitely not limited to Bear Stearns. Among investment banks that do not report to the Fed, the biggest players are Lehman Brothers, Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and Merrill Lynch. And among those who do report to the Fed, the five dominant players in derivatives that I mentioned a moment ago are Citibank, Bank of America, Wachovia, HSBC and the biggest of them all: JPMorgan Chase. We believe all are vulnerable, in varying degrees, to the kind of crisis that struck Bear Stearns last week. '' It is far from inconceivable that JPMC had a very distinct interest in acquiring BS. And in the circumstances is unlikely to be forthcoming either on its own account or the acquisition's insofar that regard. A point which I sense is contributing to greater market confidence - (displayable in the BS stock price today). viz. this could be the truly BIG ISSUE in respect of corporate America and indeed americans corporate around the globe..
pp J |
|
|
| Update 4: CoD... |
[Mar. 19th, 2008|11:15 am] |
In from TOL this insider from BS. Seeks to be amused - distractedly - and succeeds in giving me a laugh at the pub name - Slug & Lettuce on London's Canary Wharf(harks back to 70s/80s "I fink four!" crowd - but thereafter, aside from some useful refs re bonus splits, payouts etc the "wake" wore on..
and off.. into the following morning's headaches..
If this should happen to reach Times Online screens I'd like them try for an answer. This question: MAV = Master Asset Vehicles - how new/novel are they?
Master trusts I know about and, in terms of securitization etc they can appear to be used in some very 'unusual' ways.. structured (SIV-like) for instance.. but when you get to scrutinise them as such possibs they appear to feed on contribs only ie no actual other collateral.. and you can't help but think that the deceit potentials of language alone are being deployed against lesser intellects of investor populations..
Answers welcome..
pp J |
|
|
| CoD: Update 3.. |
[Mar. 18th, 2008|08:44 pm] |
And NOW for Jim Rogers's take on BS - (h/t: ML-I) —'You know the reason they did it this way was because, if Bear Stearns had to declare bankruptcy, you'd realize that Bear Stearns paid out billions of dollars in bonuses in January - six weeks ago. If he let them go into bankruptcy, they all would have had to send back their bonuses. This is what they're doing, they're doing it so they don't have to give back their bonuses.' pp J |
|
|
| CoD: Update 2 — |
[Mar. 18th, 2008|08:14 pm] |
These folk have kindly collated and linked to a selection of articles on BS.. includes individuals now biting the bullet big time.. (IMO one of two words in that could be worth local looksees) and no one but no one would leave off JPM possibs.. and there are others as you'll see..
pp J |
|
|
| COD: update 1 .. |
[Mar. 18th, 2008|04:09 pm] |
To hand this pull from Ken Sweet@FoxNews(biz):—Bear’s employees currently own about one-third of the firm’s stock. It was considered a point of pride among Bear employees to own stock in the firm, and selling that stock was considered bad form. Indeed, employees often received their annual bonuses in the form of stock. Bonuses received recently are now basically worthless.
Even the company’s top management was required to own significant stakes. Former Bear Chief Executive Jimmy Cayne’s was worth nearly $1 billion as recent as last year when the firm’s stock was at $170. That paper wealth has now evaporated. Apparently some of the offices' foyers were tagged by real estate agents on a basis that (former) employees would soon be selling down on their prestige properties etc..
pp J |
|
|
| Catch of the Day - whatever (numeral it is) |
[Mar. 18th, 2008|02:40 pm] |
Regarding the calls for greater clarity in current status terms of the US markets, Tom Palley - h/t MarkT@EV - has penned the following:—The current problem is that asset prices are falling owing to lack of confidence, triggering margin calls on these non-bank lenders. That has compelled them to sell assets, further driving down prices and triggering further calls. Some lenders have been unable to meet these calls, threatening bankruptcy even though their underlying loans are still performing. That threatens a cascade of asset price collapse. in his latest piece entitled Preventing a Financial Crash.
In the matter of asset prices for Bear Stearns, for example, SEC filings reveal that in reality BS was carrying more than $28 billion in 'level 3' assets on its books at the end of fiscal 2007. Set against a net equity position of only $11.7 billion.
In other words, the company's balance sheet was highly leveraged to many untradable and potentially worthless assets.. (Level 3s). Furthermore, elsewhere in the same filings was straight out declaration of 'fair value' attribution all known assets. The L3s are not market valued in any real sense of that term.. REPEAT: it's own balance sheet.
Which to me - and even allowing a beneficial interpretation on incompetence versus criminality - explains the ready and great willingness of BS people to sellout at fractions of their previously claimed/rated stock values.
Unrelated to the above perhaps, but in BS's case we must recognise that it was essentially a COUNTERPARTY player. [ every deal; requires at least two parties like buyers and sellers.. to a seller the other party is counterparty..and vice versa ]. At 30 November 2007 filings show how BS had contract amounts approximating $13.4 trillion and 'business' had grown to this in a single year(from 2006) by $4.66 trillion. [ Who are holding the other ends..? ]
For illustrative purposes, these figures are big enough to embrace the whole of the US property market. IMO they are why the US Fed participated in the JP Morgan buyout. Without it, and books going to the bankruptcy wolves instead of a secure deep vault at JPM, all hell would have broken loose.
pp J |
|
|
| Having said I'd.. |
[Mar. 14th, 2008|10:41 pm] |
try something a wee while ago.. the well-sighted will understand instantly and hopefully quit moaning about p pills—what is to be will be—whats more the be is a p! I'm saying don't figure policy positions in isolation. Keep that certain balance and focus moving along. And, if I may, stick ever closer together. Cos division doth divide.. and sidetracked you don't need..
So, without more ado..Mar. 14 - Japan, home to the Kyoto Protocol, will host green talks aimed at curbing carbon emissions and funding clean energy projects.
Y'see their need is very great.. and oil costs (regardless any sentiment to the contrary) are becoming prohibitive. Making premium if not pre-emptive design the basis of survival..
pp J |
|
|
| So Kind of.. |
[Mar. 12th, 2008|08:06 pm] |
The Times online(tol) to itemise what might well be the backstory elsewhere.. including your place..The push for joined-up government apparently has not reached the Civil Aviation Authority. The new pricing regime for users of Heathrow and Gatwick had airlines frothing yesterday of course, but the Bank of England cannot have been too chuffed either. Heathrow has been given the green light to increase the prices it charges airlines by 80 per cent over five years.
These kinds of officially sanctioned inflation-busting price increases are precisely the sort of precedent that sparks other price and wage rises.
Now okay I know kiwis have had a four letter exemplar - beginning with m - but still the question persists as we've mentioned before why would they want 40 per cent and feign non-controlling voting rights. The most likely answer, as before, is revenue or cashflow. And a price hike of the above precedent-setting order would amply compensate other matters.. wouldn't you think..?
Time to ask who knew and when did they know it..?
pp J |
|
|
| Brief Visit.. |
[Mar. 9th, 2008|01:58 pm] |
IT MAY HAVE BEEN — to Jpohn Quiggins's take on any likely proposition post-ratings agencies.
But in the comments a most apt and important remark. Made by none other than Adam Smith himself.Every profession is a conspiracy against the public. Unexpected, as I said, and hardly by a conspiracy theorist, but there it stands..
pp J |
|
|
| Here We Are.. |
[Mar. 7th, 2008|01:33 pm] |
Some time ago I was urged to become enchanted with olde Russian lore.. peruse the animations before..
when, dear amis, I cannot say
though the following 10minute sweetie
could make your day...
look and learn and ask yourselves are the peoples there much different to the peoples here..?
pp J |
|
|
| Catch of the Day - XXII |
[Mar. 6th, 2008|02:18 pm] |
Making whole sectors of the economy the OBJECT is one - dare I say strong - way of getting on to the business.
With an interesting article Ana Campoy @ wsj fleshed this out some with her take on the PIRG(Public Interest Research Group) report today. Opening:—While the Bush administration aims to cut gasoline use by focusing on more ethanol and making cars more fuel efficient, it’s totally missing the train when it comes to public transportation...[PIRG's] "A Better Way to Go" states that the federal government should be pouring more cash into mass transit rather than preserving America’s car culture. The Figures...
Public transportation saved about 3.4 billion gallons of gasoline and cut global warming emissions by about 26 million tons in 2006, according to the report.
Revealing is when we consider how total annual US emissions tonnage is 1.9bn, according to Energy Dept data.
But solving the problem cannot come from adding to it per the last Bush administration proposal to re-channel $3.2bn transit money into funding highways.
PIRG's transportation advocate John Krieger says: “We’ve got everything from worsening oil dependency and urban traffic congestion to rising gas prices and a booming demand for public transit.. Moving in the wrong direction is tremendously irresponsible.”
Clearly the USA is no Europe where the broader acceptance for public transportation is longstanding: greater distances and dispersed populations are the rule. And high-speed trains are an easier sell as a mere 5-hour trip coast-to-coast. And yes, cars do offer greater personal mobility than even top metros can't match. Factors adding to difficulties for developing more pub;lic transit in the US.
The deeper problem, however, according to PIRG "is that the nation has no clear goal of what its transportation system should achieve. As a result, one of the report's authors says, "the Transportation Bill has become “synonymous with pet-project spending, exactly what it shouldn’t be.”
That is to say that under currrent rules it’s easier to get money for highways than for public transit.
More Figures ...
Gasoline demand is falling like it hasn’t for 16 years. Use of public busses, subways, and commuter trains rose 30% between 1995 and 2006. That’s almost twice as fast as the overall rate of population growth( per U.S. Census )
And yes, most relevant markets are getting structural change, industry experts say. With time running out real fast on the big picture and what is known for our planet, the report's recommendations look timely and opportune. For effective adoption. Goal-scoring. Winning. With people, for people, by people.
________
Holding my views to myself on this US Election 2008 scenario. Wiser ones still hold out until the actual presidential campaigns get underway. When the choices are clearer is when to get involved.. speaks for itself.. you might spend a heap of dosh and time otherwise.. though one listens, learns, notes from afar.. at which point and patently observing a very astute democratic party nominations process - just look at those turnouts.. for primaries! - and as things progress maybe take in additional newsworthiness. As, IMO, today's NYTimes' editorial which, most pertinently, concludes:—It's unclear how the Democratic campaign will end. But that's fine. Nearly a third of the 50 states have yet to hold a nominating contest. Before they do, we'd like to hear fewer character attacks and a lot more discussion of the nation's many problems after nearly eight years of failed Republican rule. That is the Democrats' comparative advantage, they should start to use it now. pp J |
|
|
| Catch of the Day - XXI |
[Mar. 4th, 2008|02:03 pm] |
With US polls putting President G.W. Bush's leadership in the twenty something percents presently and this a fairly dramatic fall since 2005/6 there are several good reasons to examine why. That is to say, beyond the very obvious reasons already well-established.
Another one will doubtless become known in and/or around what Vanity Fair has entitled The Gaza Bombshell for its April, 2008 edition. The online read runs to 8 pages and would appear to extensively document VF's sources. Form page 1, however, we have the following —Some sources call the scheme “Iran-contra 2.0,” recalling that Abrams [ SoS Rice's National Security sidekick ] was convicted (and later pardoned) for withholding information from Congress during the original Iran-contra scandal under President Reagan. There are echoes of other past misadventures as well: the C.I.A.’s 1953 ouster of an elected prime minister in Iran, which set the stage for the 1979 Islamic revolution there; the aborted 1961 Bay of Pigs invasion, which gave Fidel Castro an excuse to solidify his hold on Cuba; and the contemporary tragedy in Iraq.
Within the Bush administration, the Palestinian policy set off a furious debate. One of its critics is David Wurmser, the avowed neoconservative, who resigned as Vice President Dick Cheney’s chief Middle East adviser in July 2007, a month after the Gaza coup. Rich pickings indeed. Wurmzer's contention is that "dirty wars" instal corrupt dictatorships. And corrupt dictatorships of the intended Bush design are/were .. for want of many more words.. serviceable.
Recommended
ps: stunning I thought was the depicted expression of Condoleeza Rice there. Devoid of feeling, life—in its way the subject rather than what the POTUS had earlier described as "the Face" of America abroad.
pp J |
|
|
| Update iV: CoD XX.. |
[Mar. 1st, 2008|01:19 pm] |
Mr. Ulrich, who works at The Focus Group in Scottsdale. "I'd never had people doing that before, if they had to it was something they were forced into. But these people are choosing it as a strategy, and I think it's going to be happening a lot more."
h/t: MGETA
pp J |
|
|
| Update II - CoD XX... |
[Mar. 1st, 2008|12:25 pm] |
And mishglobal has a (prior) comment made elsewhere I'm advised but to the point here also:—I reported on "Top Rated" Alt-A securities in Evidence of "Walking Away" In WaMu Mortgage Pool. If you have not seen the chart, take a look. It's pretty stunning. 92.6% of a Washington Mutual Alt-A pool of recent vintage was rated AAA. Yet 15% of the whole pool is in foreclosure or REO after a mere 8 months!
pp J |
|
|
| Update: CoD XX |
[Mar. 1st, 2008|12:13 pm] |
Andrew Clavell @ crookery(financial) cites Professor Nouriel Roubini's testimony to Congress recently:—"So let us consider the implications for the household sector of price declines of the order of 20 to 30%. The math is simple as I will flesh out in this note: 10 to 15 million households will end up in negative equity territory and will be likely to default on their homes and walk away from them. Then, the losses for the financial system from these massive defaults will be of the order of $1 trillion to $2 trillion" This is around 13 percent of total households and whilst the figures might suggest an unsustainable homeless component - braziers and hot coals belong to the past and Norman Rockwell depictions after all - taking merely one half makes for huge losses and gross breakage of trust. Not to mention its future consequences..
pp J |
|
|